Did the Pfizer Trial Show the Vaccine Increases Heart Disease Deaths? | Chris Masterjohn, PhD

Disclaimer: I am not a medical doctor and this is not medical advice. My goal is to empower you with information. I will not take a position on whether you should or should not get vaccinated. Please make this decision yourself, consulting sources you trust, including a caring health care professional.

In my last post, I laid out the argument that all-cause mortality is the most important metric to look at for evaluating the risk and reward of COVID vaccines. We saw that the American observational data appears to be hidden and obfuscated by the CDC. The English observational data, by contrast, suggests that among young people the vaccinated might be dying at twice the rate as the unvaccinated, but that this data is hopelessly confounded by grouping everyone between the ages of 10 and 59 together. We also saw that, among those over 60, the vaccinated appeared to have an initial mortality benefit during the COVID wave at the beginning of this year, but their benefit spent the rest of the year nosediving. It has now almost disappeared and may or may not be headed for a net mortality increase in the months to come.

The observational data is all confounded by variations in health status, health-seeking and health care-seeking behavior, diet, lifestyle, and lack of control for the distance of time between vaccination and death.

When dealing with such confounders, we must turn to the clinical trials. Since they are large and randomized, they tend to randomly distribute all known and unknown confounders between groups. So, today, we turn to the six-month results of the Pfizer trial. Was all-cause mortality impacted? As we will see, the differences are not statistically significant, but there is cause for concern that the vaccine could be increasing the risk of lethal heart disease.

The Design of the Trial

44,165 people were randomized to the Pfizer vaccine or a saline placebo, 20,030 received at least one dose of vaccine or placebo, and after some of them dropped out for various reasons, 21,759 received both doses of the vaccine and 21,650 received both doses of the placebo.

It is somewhat misleading to call this the “six-month” results of the Pfizer trial. After a two-month followup, which was really a 6-week followup from being “fully vaccinated” (a median of 2 months following the second dose, which is six weeks after the two-week waiting period to be considered “fully vaccinated”), the emergency use authorization (EUA) was given. The cutoff for the “two-month” data used to grant the EUA was October 9, 2020, while the EUA was given on December 11, allowing an additional two months of followup.

Once the EUA was given, the trial participants were given the option to learn which group they were in. If they were in the placebo group, they were given the option to be vaccinated.

Continue reading on Source: Did the Pfizer Trial Show the Vaccine Increases Heart Disease Deaths?

Originally discovered on LewRockwell.com

Hang on! We knew about Covid WHEN??? | Clayton and Natali Morris | Redacted

“A new report shows that the U.S. was hiring Covid-19 researchers three months before the pandemic began. And where were they hiring for these positions. Ukraine. Of course. https://expose-news.com/2023/03/27/us…

✅ Sign up for our Free DAILY newsletter, delivered right to your inbox first thing in the morning. ➜ https://redacted.inc

✅ Become a Redacted Rebel VIP and get access to EXCLUSIVE content, live streams, and more!

https://redacted.locals.com

🐦 Follow Redacted on Twitter: https://Twitter.com/TheRedactedInc

📚 Read Clayton and Natali’s Amazon best-selling book on finance. How To Pay Off Your Mortgage in 5 Years

👉🏻 https://amzn.to/3Guh4IC

More: Click on Watch on YouTube above see information below video.

Bombshell Vax Analysis Finds $147 Billion In Economic Damage, Tens Of Millions Injured Or Disabled | Research firm Phinance Technologies | ZeroHedge.com

BY TYLER DURDEN
TUESDAY, MAR 28, 2023 – 08:20 PM

A new report estimates that 26.6 million people were injured, 1.36 million disabled, and 300,000 excess deaths can be attributed to COVID-19 vaccine damages in 2022 alone, which cost the economy nearly $150 billion.

Research firm Phinance Technologies, founded and operated by former Blackrock portfolio manager Ed Dowd, Yuri Nunes (PhD Physics, MSc Mathematics) and Carlos Alegria (PhD Physics, Finance), split the impact of the vaccines into four broad categories to estimate the human costs associated with the Covid-19 vaccine; no effect or asymptomatic, those who sustained injuries (mild-to-moderate outcome), those who became disabled (severe outcome), and death (extreme outcome). Data on vaccine disabilities and injuries comes directly from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), while the excess death figures are derived from official figures on deaths in the US via two different methods (methodology here).

It’s important to note that people in one category (injured, for example) can move into latter categories of severity – which this analysis does not take into consideration.

“We need to remember that not only are these groupings an attempt to characterize different levels of damage from the inoculations, they are not static and could interact with each other,” reads the report. “For instance, there might be individuals who had no visible effects after vaccination but nonetheless could still be impacted.”

Individuals with mild injuries from the inoculations could, over time, develop severe injuries to the extent of being disabled, or an extreme outcome such as death.”

Estimating the economic cost

In analyzing each of the above categories, Phinance used absolute excess lost worktime (see previous report) to determine that the direct economic cost of vaccine injuries was $79.5 billion in 2022, and $52.2 billion for those with severe disabilities.

Continue reading on Source: Bombshell Vax Analysis Finds $147 Billion In Economic Damage, Tens Of Millions Injured Or Disabled

Spooks: The Herding of Humanity Published May 20, 2021 | By Dr. Will Tuttle | WorldPeaceDiet.org

We humans have been herding animals as livestock for thousands of years, using our superior intellects to exploit them relentlessly. Though we know they suffer at our hands, with regard to animals, we smash the Golden Rule to smithereens.

Pig by visionary artist Madeleine TuttleWe don’t seem to realize it, but we pay a steep price for the ongoing avalanche of abuse we inflict on them. In stealing the purposes and sovereignty of cows, pigs, chickens, and other animals, we have eroded our inherent sovereignty, intelligence, spiritual clarity, self-respect, inner peace, and ethical integrity. Now we see our enslavement of animals boomeranging especially vividly into our human world, with many of the same dynamics playing out before our eyes.

For example, it’s not difficult for a handful of relatively incompetent shepherds or cowboys to successfully herd several hundred sheep or cows into a corral with a chute to be trucked off to be hung upside down and stabbed to death. The main technique is to spook them. Spooking the animals causes them to stampede in the desired direction. By simply applying some spooking actions, like loud shouts and shocking sounds, or slaps, whacks, and abrupt, frightening movements, the animals predictably flee in the direction they’re being guided, right to their terrifying demise. By riding horses, and using dogs and fences, the process is even more manageable and predictable.

Cow by visionary artist Madeleine TuttleThe herders may have, up until this roundup, posed as benefactors to the animals, making sure they had safety, food, and water. Now however, their true intent and purpose is revealed. The good shepherd’s mask comes off. The formerly friendly herder shows his true face and the animal victims seem powerless to resist or escape.

Perhaps in all the confusion of the roundup, a few courageous and wily cows or sheep might be able to slip away into the surrounding forest, unnoticed by the herders, and live out their days in peace, free from human exploitation. Or even more remarkably, all the cows or sheep might simply refuse to be spooked and bullied by the tiny handful of humans, and decide to turn and easily trample by them and then live out their lives in peace and freedom, fulfilling their purposes in nature as they have done for millions of years before the advent of human herders.

Clearly, we are in an analogous position today, and the vast mass of humanity is being spooked, often quite clumsily, by a tiny elite that takes advantage of our gullibility, conformity, and complacency to relentlessly spook and herd us into the chute of complete oppression, and the misery to which that inevitably leads. The captured media is the main tool used to spook the public, and the herders now ride their horses of power as authorities in governmental, corporate, and academic institutions, with a whole army of herd-dogs in the form of indoctrinated journalists, public health bureaucrats, and medical personnel, and with plenty of fencing installed to censor alternative views and stifle debate, critical thinking, and community solidarity.

For those with eyes and ears, there are two main points to consider and upon which to act. First, actively question the bogus medical narratives that attempt to stampede the global populace into abject submission. Refusing to be spooked or to comply with the mandates and social pressure to conform, endeavor to exemplify the noble qualities of human dignity, self-reliance, compassion, justice, and freedom, and to educate others about the hidden agenda being forced onto humanity by its would-be herders.

Please continue reading on Will’s website: http://www.worldpeacediet.com/2021/05/spooks-the-herding-of-humanity/

and prepare to be amazed when you read his bio! http://worldpeacediet.org/bio.htm

Thank you, Will!

Source: Spooks: The Herding of Humanity Published May 20, 2021 | By Will Tuttle

Children Should Not Be Subjugated To Experimental Medical Therapies/Drugs | Michelle Perro, MD | The Real Truth About Health

Children Should Not Be Subjugated To Experimental Medical Therapies/Drugs Michelle Perro, MD

http://www.gmoscience.org

• Book – What’s Making our Children Sick

#MichellePerro #Glyphosate #GutHealth #Children

Michelle Perro, MD is a veteran clinician with nearly four decades of experience in both pediatrics as well as in integrative medicine treating both children and their families. Her career began in Pediatric Emergency Medicine winding its way into integrative medicine over the past 20 years. She has been director of a Pediatric Emergency Department in NYC and spent over a decade at UCSF Benioff Oakland Children’s Hospital. Dr. Perro has been a tireless advocate regarding the role of GM food and their associated pesticides centered on their effect on children’s health. She is co-author of the highly acclaimed book, What’s Making our Children Sick? This book Explores the links between GM foods, glyphosate, and gut health. With chronic disorders among American children reaching epidemic levels, hundreds of thousands of parents are desperately seeking solutions to their children’s declining health. What’s Making Our Children Sick? convincingly explains how agrochemical industrial production and genetic modification of foods is a culprit to this epidemic. Most chronic health disorders have multiple causes and require careful diagnosis and complex treatments. However, what if toxicants in our foods are a major culprit, one that, if corrected, could fix our health? What’s Making Our Children Sick? explores the frightening links between our efforts to create higher-yield, cost-efficient foods and an explosion of childhood morbidity, but it also offers hope and a path to effecting change. What’s Making Our Children Sick? exposes our current predicament and offers insight on the medical responses that are available, both to heal our kids and to reverse the compromised health of our food supply. She is the Executive Director and co-founder of the website http://www.gmoscience.org. Her column, Pediatric Pearls, can be found in the integrative medical journal, The Townsend Letter.

Her Youtube channel can be found by searching GMO Science.

To Contact Michelle Perro, M.D Go to GordonMedical.com/

CLICK HERE – To Checkout Our MEMBERSHIP CLUB: http://www.therealtruthabouthealth.com

‘Have You Vaccinated Your Children?’: Rand Paul Grills Moderna CEO Over Adverse Vaccine Reactions

Sen. Rand Paul grilled Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel on Wednesday over whether the shot is safe for teen boys, citing an increased risk of myocarditis.

See article and video on DailyCaller.com: ‘Have You Vaccinated Your Children?’: Rand Paul Grills Moderna CEO Over Adverse Vaccine Reactions

3 Years to Slow The Spread: Covid hysteria and the creation of a never-ending crisis | written by jordan schachtel | RonPaulInstitute.org

Thursday marked the three year anniversary of the infamous “15 Days To Slow The Spread” campaign.

By March 16, yours truly was already pretty fed up with both the governmental and societal “response” to what was being baselessly categorized as the worst pandemic in 100 years, despite zero statistical data supporting such a serious claim.

I was living in the Washington, D.C. Beltway at the time, and it was pretty much impossible to find a like-minded person within 50 miles who also wasn’t taking the bait. After I read about the news coming out of Wuhan in January, I spent much of the next couple weeks catching up to speed and reading about what a modern pandemic response was supposed to look like.

What surprised me most was that none of “the measures” were mentioned, and that these designated “experts” were nothing more than failed mathematicians, government doctors, and college professors who were more interested in policy via shoddy academic forecasting than observing reality.

Within days of continually hearing their yapping at White House pressers, it quickly became clear that the Deborah Birxes and Anthony Faucis of the world were engaging in nothing more than a giant experiment. There was no evidence-based approach to managing Covid whatsoever. These figures were leaning into the collective hysteria, and brandishing their credentials as Public Health Experts to demand top-down approaches to stamping out the WuFlu.

Continue reading on Source: 3 Years to Slow The Spread: Covid hysteria and the creation of a never-ending crisis

3 years later, there still isn’t an end date…

Anthony Fauci appeared on MSNBC Thursday morning and declared that Americans would need annual Covid boosters to compliment their Flu shots.

 

‘Simply Obscene’: FDA Approves Fourth COVID Shot for Infants and Kids Under 5 

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s decision Tuesday to allow infants and children 6 months through age 4 to get Pfizer’s bivalent booster shot drew harsh criticism from pediatricians and others who said children don’t need any COVID-19 vaccines, let alone four doses.

Miss a day, miss a lot. Subscribe to The Defender’s Top News of the DayIt’s free.

Infants and children 6 months through age 4 who received the three-dose primary series of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine are now eligible for a fourth dose — Pfizer’s bivalent booster shot.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on Tuesday amended the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of Pfizer bivalent COVID-19 booster vaccine for the younger age group, but only for those children who received the three-dose series before the FDA authorized Pfizer’s bivalent Omicron booster as the third shot in the primary series.

Under the amended authorization, children can receive their fourth shot two months after completing the three-dose primary series.

Peter Marks, M.D., Ph.D., director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, said the authorization gave parents the opportunity to “update their children’s protection.”

But critics including Peter McCullough, M.D., MPH, an internist and cardiologist, said the shots pose long-term safety concerns for children.

“I am greatly concerned about the long-term safety of accumulating novel mRNA and Wuhan spike protein in previously healthy children,” McCullough told The Defender. “Continued shots are not natural and cannot make their bodies healthier.”

Mary Holland, president and general counsel of Children’s Health Defense said:

“If one ever needed proof of which side the FDA is on, Pharma’s or the people’s, one need look no further than its authorization of a fourth COVID shot for children under 5.

“With knowledge that these shots don’t work and that they can cause severe harm, including death, this decision is simply obscene.”

Dr. Michelle Perro, a pediatrician with more than 40 years of experience in acute and integrative medicine, told The Defender, “Medical logic and reason have taken a back seat to an unfathomable policy based on fiction.”

Perro added:

“With the steady stream of information now available on VAERS [Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System] and other global vaccine reporting systems, the harm caused to children from this unnecessary ‘vaccine’ is nothing short of pediacide.”

Perro pointed out that according to some researchers’ estimates, children under 18 are 51 times more likely to die from the mRNA vaccines than from COVID-19 if unvaccinated.

Perro, who said she will deliver a conference lecture in April on how to help children who have been harmed by the COVID-19 vaccines, said:

“The time is now for parents to do what’s best for their children and refuse this experimental technology.”

Muriel Blaive, Ph.D., tweeted:

Continued on Source: ‘Simply Obscene’: FDA Approves Fourth COVID Shot for Infants and Kids Under 5

U.S. Covid Lab breach EXPOSED, this CHANGES EVERYTHING | Redacted with Natali and Clayton Morris

Was the lab leak in the U.S. and not in China after all? Why were U.S. biolabs researching Covid in 2019 and then shut down for “breaches”? Was Covid in the U.S. way before 2020? We look into the U.S. biolabs and some strange coincidences that make it seem fishy that the U.S. has not opened its border to the WHO for origin-testing investigations. Hmmmm….Was the lab leak in the U.S. and not in China after all? Why were U.S. biolabs researching Covid in 2019 and then shut down for “breaches”? Was Covid in the U.S. way before 2020? We look into the U.S. biolabs and some strange coincidences that make it seem fishy that the U.S. has not opened its border to the WHO for origin-testing investigations. Hmmmm….

✅ Sign up for our Free DAILY newsletter, delivered right to your inbox first thing in the morning. ➜ https://redacted.inc

✅ Become a Redacted Rebel VIP and get access to EXCLUSIVE content, live streams, and more!

https://redacted.locals.com

🐦 Follow Redacted on Twitter: https://Twitter.com/TheRedactedInc

📚 Read Clayton and Natali’s Amazon best-selling book on finance. How To Pay Off Your Mortgage in 5 Years 👉🏻 https://amzn.to/3Guh4IC

💥 Follow us on RUMBLE: Come follow us on Rumble, a free speech platform, just in case anything happens to the YouTube channel due to censorship. https://Rumble.com/Redacted 🚀 Limited Time: Get up to17 Free stocks with moomoo! Open a free account and claim your free stocks after you make your initial deposits click here to learn more ➡ https://redacted.inc/moomoo 🚀 LIVE STREAM SCHEDULE: Monday – Thursday 1PM PST / 3PM CENTRAL / 4PM EST 📺 Want to bypass chat limits on our LIVE streams? Become a YouTube Channel Member today. This is TOTALLY different than the community over on Locals. Head to this link to join:    / @redactednews   #redacted #claytonmorris #natalimorris #news #independentjournalists —– About Clayton and Natali Morris: Clayton Morris is a former Fox News anchor. In Redacted, Clayton and his wife Natali take an in-depth look at the legal, social, financial, and personal issues that matter to you. They want to set the record straight and bring you the stories nobody else is telling. Along with the facts and the full picture, Redacted offers real-world analysis without an agency driven by corporate overloads. With Clayton’s extensive journalism experience, he isn’t afraid to demand the truth from authorities. Redacted is an independent platform, unencumbered by external factors or restrictive policies, on which Clayton and Natali Morris bring you quality information, balanced reporting, constructive debate, and thoughtful narratives. DISCLAIMER: Some of the links in this description and in our videos may be affiliate links and pay us a small commission if you use them. We really appreciate the support. The content in our Youtube videos SHALL NOT be construed as tax, legal, insurance, construction, engineering, health & safety, electrical, financial advice, or other & may be outdated or inaccurate; it is your responsibility to verify all information. We are not financial advisers. We only express our opinions based on our experiences. Your experience may be different. Investing of any kind involves risk. While it is possible to minimize risk, your investments are solely your responsibility. You must conduct your own research. There is NO guarantee of gains or losses on investments. These videos are for entertainment purposes ONLY. IF stocks or companies are mentioned, we MAY have an ownership interest in them — DO NOT make buying or selling decisions based on these videos. If you need advice, please contact a qualified CPA, attorney, insurance agent, contractor/electrician/engineer/etc., financial advisor, or the appropriate professional for the subject you would like help with. Linked items may create a financial benefit for our company. Follow Clayton on Twitter: https://Twitter.com/ClaytonMorris Follow Natali on Twitter: https://Twitter.com/NataliMorris

Could This Man Have Saved the World? | by Peter Breggin MD & Ginger Breggin | America Out Loud | Mar 5, 2023

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

On February 2, 2023, Robert W. Malone, MD, finally called for a ban on mRNA and DNA COVID injections — years after many of us had come to the same conclusion.1 But to our shock, we have now discovered that Malone, more than three years ago, had already scientifically proven and published that these COVID vaccinations with genetic mRNA and DNA were too dangerous for human consumption, even experimentally. He never made professional or public disclosures of this information. Meanwhile, the article remained in obscurity until we recently discovered it.

In January 2020, Malone published on ResearchGate an elaborate scientific paper with MIT researcher Darrell O. Ricke as the first author in which the two concluded that all COVID-19 vaccines, including mRNA, were too deadly to be given even experimentally to humans.2 The duo of Ricke and Malone followed this up by submitting the paper to Lancet, and the journal put the article up on its prepublication platform in March 2020.3 The article is still in place today online and has never, to our knowledge, been published in a fully peer-reviewed format.

As Malone became famous, especially among health freedom researchers and activists, he never mentioned the January and March 2020 online publications of the article. As he became a public figure with considerable influence, he never drew professional or public attention to this scientific conclusion that the mRNA vaccines were literally unfit for human consumption, even experimentally. He never disclosed that he and his coauthor had proven this to their own satisfaction in their own laboratory research and in a review of the scientific literature.

Listen to this article and continue reading on Source: Could This Man Have Saved the World?